The laws that turn WCAG into a legal requirement
WCAG itself is a voluntary technical standard; its legal force comes from the laws and regulations that reference it, and that list keeps growing.
The ADA: US businesses and governments
The Americans with Disabilities Act predates the web, but the Department of Justice has long taken the position that it applies to digital content. In April 2024 the DOJ published a rule under ADA Title II requiring state and local government web content and mobile apps to conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA.
An interim final rule published in April 2026 extended the compliance dates by one year. Public entities serving 50,000 people or more now have until April 26, 2027, and smaller entities and special district governments until April 26, 2028 (source: ADA.gov). For public universities, transit agencies and city governments, captions on prerecorded video are an explicit regulatory requirement, not an interpretation.
For private businesses under Title III, the websites of public accommodations such as retailers, banks, hotels and streaming services, there is no formal technical standard yet. Courts and DOJ settlements consistently point to WCAG as the benchmark, digital accessibility lawsuits run to thousands of filings a year in US courts, and video without captions is among the barriers those complaints cite.
Section 508: federal agencies and the vendors that sell to them
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies to make their information and communication technology accessible. The US Access Board's revised 508 standards, in effect since 2018, incorporate WCAG 2.0 Level AA by reference (source: access-board.gov). That includes the media criteria: captions on prerecorded video and audio description at Level AA.
Section 508 also reaches contractors and vendors selling to the federal government, which is why accessibility conformance reports (ACRs, based on the VPAT template) now show up in procurement. If your training videos or product demos are part of a federal sale, they need captions.
The European Accessibility Act: enforcement is live
The European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) has applied since June 28, 2025. It covers a broad range of digital products and services sold in the EU, including e-commerce, banking, audiovisual media services, e-books and transport services, and it reaches non-EU companies selling into the EU market.
Its requirements are assessed against the harmonized European standard EN 301 549, which incorporates the WCAG success criteria, including those for time-based media. Enforcement and penalties are set by each member state, so fines vary by country. US companies selling covered services to EU consumers are in scope.
Broadcast and streaming: FCC rules and the CVAA
In the US, the 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA) and FCC rules require closed captions on video programming that aired on US television with captions and is later distributed online. If you republish broadcast content on the web, the caption obligation follows it.
This page is general information, not legal advice. For compliance decisions, consult counsel familiar with your jurisdiction and sector.
How transcripts and captions satisfy each requirement
The pattern across every framework is the same: text alternatives for audio, synchronized captions for video and description of meaningful visuals.
Transcripts
A transcript satisfies 1.2.1 for audio-only content outright: publish an accurate transcript with the episode and the criterion is met. A descriptive transcript, one that includes the relevant visual information alongside the dialogue, also satisfies 1.2.3 at Level A and 1.2.8 at Level AAA. Sonix's automated transcription converts audio to text at 99% accuracy on clear recordings, and the editor lets you add visual descriptions before you publish.
Captions
Captions satisfy 1.2.2, and the key word in the criterion is synchronized: caption text must be timed to the audio. Sonix generates automated subtitles with word-level timing and exports SRT, VTT and TTML files that work with YouTube, Vimeo and every major player and editing suite.
For the full production workflow, from splitting and timing to burning captions into the picture, see our automated subtitles and captions pillar and the guide on how to place subtitles in a video.
SDH subtitles
SDH subtitles go a step further than standard captions by adding speaker identification, sound effects and music cues, which is what deaf and hard-of-hearing viewers need to follow the full soundtrack. WCAG's definition of captions includes non-speech audio information, so SDH-style output is the safer target for 1.2.2. Sonix labels speakers automatically and you add the sound cues in the editor; our SDH subtitles guide covers formats, conventions and workflow.
Audio description
Audio description is the one requirement text cannot fully cover at Level AA, and Sonix does not generate audio description narration tracks. What Sonix provides is the fastest path to the two adjacent obligations: descriptive transcripts that satisfy 1.2.3 at Level A, and accurate scripts and timing that make recording a description track with a voice artist or a text-to-speech tool much faster.
If your conformance target is WCAG 2.1 or 2.2 AA and your videos carry meaningful visual-only information, plan audio description production alongside your captioning workflow.
Live captions
Criterion 1.2.4 applies to live streams and webinars. The Sonix workflow on this page is built for prerecorded media, so for live events book a real-time captioning (CART) provider or ask about Sonix real-time transcription for enterprise, then run the recording through Sonix afterwards so the on-demand version meets 1.2.2 with clean, corrected captions.
Compliance comes down to accuracy and volume
Captions only count toward WCAG when they convey the audio accurately, and most teams hold far more media than a human captioning budget covers.
Unreviewed auto-captions routinely fail manual audits because they garble names, terminology and overlapping speech. Human captioning fixes the accuracy but often costs $100 or more per hour of content, which puts a full archive out of reach.
The workflow below handles both: automated transcription takes care of the volume, and a human review pass in the editor delivers the accuracy that an audit expects.