In the Dark Podcast Transcript: Seizoen 1, Aflevering 2

In the Dark: S1 E2 The Circle

: If this is your first time listening to In the Dark, stop, go back, and start at the first episode. It’ll make a lot more sense. Last time on In the Dark.

: Een paar van hun jongens gingen naar Tom Thumb om een film te halen. En op hun weg terug, hield iemand hen tegen.

Toen je rende, keek je toen om?

: Ja, zodra we daar beneden waren.

Wat heb je gezien?

: Nothing. He wasn’t there anymore.

De 11-jarige jongen werd vermist in 1989, en sindsdien is het een mysterie.

: Eindelijk weten we het. We weten wat de familie Wetterling en heel Minnesota hebben willen weten sinds die vreselijke nacht in 1989. We weten de waarheid.

: Zijn er dingen die je anders gedaan zou hebben als je er nu op terugkijkt?

: You always think about that, but no. I think, the people that worked on that case did truly 110% every day that we’re there. And I don’t know. I don’t know that there’s anything we could have done differently.

We’re here today because of the perseverance of investigative team; the commitment to aggressively follow up on every single lead, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant; and the absolute belief that if we continue to press, we would eventually solve this case.

: Luister. Kun je het geluid horen? Harten die kloppen, over de hele wereld.

: Five days after 11-year-old Jacob Wetterling was abducted, radio stations across Minnesota all played one of Jacob’s favorite songs, Listen by Red Grammer, along with a message for Jacob from his mom, Patty.

: I just want Jacob to know that this song is for him to hear. The heartbeat of humanity is beating for him. I know it will give him strength. If there’s an ounce of compassion in the man who’s holding him, he will let him go safely. Listen, Jacob. Can you hear our prayers? We love you.

Medewerkers van het radiostation en voorbijgangers hielden elkaars hand vast. Sommigen in de media huilden zelfs. De emoties nemen toe met de zoektocht op dit moment.

I’m hoping that he would know that we’re out the snow looking for him, that we didn’t give up.

: The people in the town of St. Joseph seemed driven by the belief that by brute force of will, they could bring Jacob back. They made fliers with Jacob’s photo, and put them everywhere, on telephone poles, on shop windows, on doors and parked cars. Everywhere you went, you’d see people with white ribbons pinned to their shirts to symbolize hope for Jacob. Thousands of people even lined up in a human chain shivering in the cold and crying.

De ketting begon op de hoofdweg vlak bij de Del-Win Ballroom.

: The chain stretched for three miles. 3500 schoolchildren were bussed in. Even two baseball players from the Minnesota Twins showed up, wearing blue warm-up jackets embroidered with Jacob’s initials.

Mensen van alle leeftijden en standen kwamen naar buiten om de hoop levend te houden, de hoop dat de 11-jarige Jacob veilig thuis zal komen.

: Jacob’s abduction fell neatly into two typical television news narratives, small town pulling together, and heroic investigators doing all they can.

Politie en vrijwilligers in de lucht en op de grond jagen verwoed op een onder schot ontvoerd jongetje.

: Binnen enkele dagen arriveerden tientallen wetshandhavers in de stad.

Zoekteams kammen het gebied ten westen van St. Cloud uit op zoek naar een spoor van de 11-jarige jongen.

: Aan het eind van de week werken er bijna honderd agenten aan de zaak. Ze kwamen overal vandaan. Sheriffs deputies, FBI agenten, staatsonderzoekers en lokale agenten uit heel Minnesota. De gouverneur riep zelfs de Nationale Garde op.

Vijf helikopters doorzochten het gebied van 30 vierkante kilometer, terwijl zoekers beneden het gebied te voet uitkamden zonder een spoor te vinden.

: Zoekers werkten 18 uur per dag.

Search crews, helicopters, and bloodhounds could not find any clue as to Jacob Wetterling’s whereabouts today, but his family has not given up hope.

: This search was massive. It was unlike anything Minnesota had seen before. In fact, it was one of the largest searches for any single missing person in the history of the United States. People just assumed every square inch of the region have been scoured, and every person who might have seen something had been interviewed, but that wasn’t true.

: This is In the Dark, an investigative podcast from APM Reports. In this series, we’re looking at what went wrong in the case of Jacob Wetterling, an 11-year-old who was kidnapped in Central Minnesota in 1989, and whose remains were found just last week.

: Today, we’re going to take a closer look at what happened the night Jacob was kidnapped. We’re going to find out how the decisions of law enforcement in this critical first few hours would allow the man who took Jacob to get away unpunished for 27 years.

: Just today, a man named Danny Heinrich appeared in a Minneapolis courtroom. I was there, along with what seemed like every other reporter in Minnesota. There were so many people, I couldn’t even get into the main courtroom, so I went into one of the two overflow rooms to watch on a video feed. And pretty soon, those rooms filled up too.

: Danny Heinrich came into the courtroom wearing a light-colored shirt and dark pants. He’s a short guy, 5’5″, stocky, with white hair. He walked up to face the judge with an attorney on either side and stood with his back to us. We all leaned in to make sure we heard what happened next. The federal prosecutor asked the question, “On October 22nd 1989, did you kidnap, sexually assault, and murder Jacob Wetterling?” “Yes I did,” Heinrich said. A loud gasp went through the courtroom, so loud it was picked up on the video feed. Finally, there would be answers to the most notorious crime in Minnesota history.

: Over de ontvoering van de 11-jarige Jacob Wetterling werd altijd gesproken als een soort van episch mysterie, met een heroïsche inspanning van de wetshandhavers die de man die Jacob meenam op de een of andere manier door hun vingers liet glippen. Ze konden niets anders doen. Jacob verdween gewoon.

: And then, Danny Heinrich began to describe what actually happened. He seemed resigned to it, like he was forcing himself to get through it. He sighed a lot. Heinrich told the judge that on the night of October 22nd, 1989, for reasons he didn’t explain, he got in his car, a blue 1982 Ford EXP, and drove half an hour from his apartment in the small town of Paynesville to St. Joseph. Inside his car was a scanner he used to pick up police dispatch and a .38 revolver.

: Sometime after 8:00 p.m., Heinrich turned onto the dead-end road that led to the Wetterling’s house. He saw three kids biking up toward town. He parked his blue Ford in a long gravel driveway across from a cornfield. And then, he waited.

: When the boys biked back, Heinrich got out of his car, put on a mask, and walked onto the road. He ordered the boys into the ditch and grabbed Jacob. Heinrich took Jacob back to his car, handcuffed him, and put him in the front passenger seat. Heinrich said, “Jacob asked him a question, ‘What did I do wrong?'” Heinrich drove Jacob around for a while, long enough that he started to hear police activity on a scanner. He told Jacob to lean forward in the seat and duck down, so no one would see him. Once they made it out of the town of St. Joseph, Heinrich told Jacob he could sit back up.

: He kept driving around for a long time. Eventually, he took Jacob back to his own town, Paynesville, about 25 miles from where he’d kidnapped Jacob. He pulled off onto a side road near a gravel pit. Heinrich took the handcuffs off Jacob, and walked him over to a row of trees. He told Jacob to take off his clothes. Heinrich also undressed. He touched Jacob and had Jacob touch him. Then, he told Jacob to masturbate in front of him.

: The assault went on for about 20 minutes. And then, Jacob told Heinrich that he was cold, so Heinrich told him he could get dressed. Jacob asked Heinrich to take him home, and Heinrich said he couldn’t. Jacob started to cry. Heinrich told him to stop.

: I noticed that Heinrich’s seemed to have trouble telling this part of the story in the courtroom. It sounded like he had trouble breathing, like it was hard to get the words out. Heinrich said he saw a patrol car come down the road, and he panicked. He loaded his gun, and shot, and killed Jacob. Then, Heinrich got in his blue car, left Jacob’s body, and drove home.

: He spent a couple of hours at his apartment. Then, he headed back out on foot carrying a shovel, and walked a little over a mile back to where Jacob’s body was. He started digging a hole, but the shovel was too small. So, he walked over to a construction company close by and stole a Bobcat. He started it up, and turned the lights on, and drove it back to the site.

: By then, it was sometime after midnight, at least three hours since Jacob had been kidnapped. Heinrich used the Bobcat to dig the grave, and he put Jacob in it, and filled it in. Heinrich returned the Bobcat, and then came back to the grave, and tried to cover it up a bit more with grass and brush. Then, he realized he’d forgotten to bury Jacob’s shoes. So, he walked for a few minutes down the road, and threw them into a ravine. And then, Heinrich walked home.

: It was one of the worst stories I’ve ever heard told in a courtroom. Even some veteran reporters were crying. Heinrich’s story was awful, but it wasn’t just his brutality that shocked me. This did not seem like a perfect crime, not by a long shot. It involved hours of driving, of walking down a main road carrying a shovel, stealing a Bobcat in the middle of the night with the lights on to dig a grave. All of this in the first few critical hours of what had always been described as a massive and thorough investigation.

: I wanted to know what law enforcement should have been doing in those critical first few hours. To find out, I needed to start with the basics, Policing 101. So, I reached out to a guy named Patrick Zirpoli to help me understand how an investigation like this is supposed to go. Zirpoli is one of the top consultants in the country on child abduction cases. He used to coordinate the Amber Alert program in Pennsylvania. Zirpoli told me there are two things you need to do right away when you arrive at a crime scene. They’re both pretty basic. First, secure the scene, then — and this is the one he stressed the most — talk to the neighbors.

: We zeggen altijd, begin dichtbij en werk naar buiten toe. Weet je, begin vanuit hun huis, begin met interviews, klop op deuren. En we zeggen altijd tegen de mensen, dat je steeds opnieuw moet interviewen. Je moet mensen meerdere keren ondervragen, niet slechts één keer. Weet je, als een zaak langer dan een dag duurt, en de tweede en derde dag ingaat, wil je iedereen opnieuw ondervragen.

: I called a couple of other experts to confirm that this immediate repeated interviewing of neighbors is standard procedure. I talked to a man named Vernon Geberth. He trains law enforcement officers all over the country. He’s one of the best known trainers in the US. He’s also worked in the New York Police Department as a lieutenant in a homicide unit in the Bronx.

: Ik heb meer dan 72.000 mensen de kunst en wetenschap van moordzaken geleerd sinds 1980. Auteur van Practical Homicide Investigation, beschouwd als de bijbel, auteur van Sex-Related Homicide and Death Investigation, auteur van Autoerotic Death Investigation, auteur van de Checklist and Field Guide Second and Third ... First and Second Edition, et cetera, wat bewijst dat ik geen leven heb.

: Geberth didn’t want to comment specifically on this case because he hasn’t seen the investigative file, but he told me it’s hard to overstate how important it is to talk to the neighbors.

: I can tell you that every major case that I was in charge of in the City of New York that resulted in a successful conclusion was based on a good neighborhood canvass, where people were asked to report anything. Even though they didn’t think it was important, it turned out to be important.

: Geberth says these people who don’t realize they’ve seen something important are called unknowing witnesses.

: Yeah, the unwilling witnesses is a term that we use when we do a canvass of the area where the event is taking place. And you never ask someone, “Did you see anything strange?” You ask them, “Did you see anything?” “Okay. I see a guy sticking a mic in my mouth right now.” Okay. That unknowing witness, that piece of information could be paramount to the investigation.

: And like, what would be an example of something that people just don’t pick up on as important?

: Iemand loopt op straat, parkeert een auto. Waarom zou dat belangrijk zijn? Nou, het zou belangrijk zijn als later, die auto werd geparkeerd op hetzelfde moment dat de moord plaatsvond.

: Juist. Hoe snel begin je met andere mensen te praten?

: Immediately. Immediately because time is your biggest enemy in an investigation. People have short memories. They don’t remember everything correctly. You got to get out there, and talk to people, and find out what the hell is going on. You have to reconstruct the time and the events going back, the dynamics of what was taking place in that area at the time.

: Hoe lang weten rechtshandhavers al van de basistechnieken om zaken op te lossen?

: Waarschijnlijk voor altijd. Sherlock Holmes. Ja, oké.

: So, knock on doors, talk to everyone, and do it right away. Basic stuff. And the agency that was responsible for doing this in the Jacob Wetterling case was the Stearnes County Sheriff’s Office. Here’s how the investigation worked. The Stearnes County Sheriff was in charge. It was sheriff’s deputies who were on the scene that night. They were the ones at the Wetterling’s house and the ones who organized all that searching that night.

: The sheriff did ask for help from the FBI and other agencies, and they arrived the next morning, but the sheriff stayed in charge of the investigation. So, I started calling some of the investigators from back then to ask them whether the sheriff and his deputies had done this policing 101 stuff, knocking on doors, asking people what they saw. And everyone was kind of dismissive when I asked them about this like, “Of course, we did that.” Here’s retired FBI agent Al Garber.

: I’m not sure, but I would assume yes. Detectives ask those questions.

: En Jeff Jamal, ook van de FBI.

: Ik denk, als de buurt heel snel en heel breed wordt bekeken.

: En voormalig Stearnes County Detective Steve Mund.

: I’m sure I did. I’m just going through the logical steps for doing investigation.

: But no one I talked to actually remembered going around and knocking on doors that night. That seemed a little odd. So, I asked another reporter I worked with, Curtis Gilbert, to call everyone he could find who’d lived on the dead-end road that Jacob, Trevor, and Aaron would have biked along the night of October 22nd 1989, and ask them a simple question, “When did law enforcement first talk to you?”

: Curtis.

: Zijn we aan het opnemen?

Ja.

: Oh oké.

: So, you’re here to give me the latest?

: Ik kan je de uitsplitsing geven. Ik heb zelfs een kleine grafiek gemaakt.

: Curtis slaagde erin wat oude stadsgidsen op te graven in een plaatselijk archief, en hij gebruikte die om uit te zoeken wie er woonde in de doodlopende straat waar de jongens op 22 oktober 1989 doorheen fietsten. Het waren bijna honderd mensen. Sommigen van hen zijn sindsdien overleden, maar Curtis probeerde er zoveel mogelijk te vinden. Hij kon er 26 bereiken.

: Laat me mijn spreadsheet erbij pakken. Ik noem dit wanneer ze voor het eerst werden ondervraagd door de politie.

: Heeft de politie met iedereen in de buurt gesproken die avond?

: That night, no way. Did you want to … I brought a little tape because I thought there’s a few interesting things.

: Yeah, that’d be great.

: Curtis played me some audio from the people he talked to. And keep in mind, it’s been 27 years, so some people’s memories aren’t great.

No, we didn’t hear anything, you know. Isn’t that weird? But they didn’t really … They didn’t come to the door that night, but they-

Oh, ongeveer twee of drie weken later, kwam de FBI binnen. Ze klopten op de deur.

Maar het was een paar weken, en ze interviewden.

: Heeft de politie ooit bij u aangeklopt sinds u in de buurt woonde? Heb je er ooit met de politie over moeten praten of?

Nee.

: Nee?

Dat hebben ze nooit gedaan.

: Hebben ze dat nooit gedaan? Oké.

: Oké. Dus, mensen die zeker weten dat ze zijn aangesproken die nacht van de 26e, twee. Twee mensen wisten zeker dat ze die nacht werden aangesproken.

: Remember, we’re not talking about everyone on the dead-end road, just the 26 people Curtis was able to reach.

: Vier mensen dachten dat ze de volgende dag of misschien die nacht werden aangesproken.

: So, two people for sure that night. And then, another four people who think they were talked to the next day, but say it’s possible it was really the first night. So, giving law enforcement the benefit of the doubt that six people on the dead-end road who were talked to by law enforcement that night out of the people Curtis talked to. As for the rest of the people, some of them said they weren’t interviewed at all. Some said they were talked to the next day. Others say they were eventually interviewed a few days or even a few weeks later, but not by local law enforcement. They remember being interviewed by the FBI because it kind of creeped them out.

: It was two agents. Everyone said they were talked to by two agents. Multiple people described those interviews this way, “There’s two. There’s two agents there. One of them asked you the questions, and the other one just watches you, watches your facial expressions.” That’s multiple people-

: Interessant.

: ...die precies in die termen beschreef.

: So, did law enforcement talk to everyone in the neighborhood that night? No. Did they go back to all the people they did interview, and talk to them over and over, like the experts say you should? No. And this failure to canvass the neighborhood thoroughly that night was a big deal. It meant that law enforcement didn’t get all the information right away when it was most important in those critical first few hours. Those hours matter because, most of the time, if a child is going to be killed by an abductor, it happens in the first five hours. You can’t go back the next day, and just redo the investigation. Most of the time, it’s too late.

: When I had pictured the kidnapping of Jacob Wetterling, I focused on the isolation that it didn’t matter if anyone talked to the neighbors because no one in the neighborhood saw anything anyway. The boys were alone on that bike ride home. The street was deserted. It was just the three boys, Jacob, Aaron, and Trevor, and the abductor waiting for them in the dark. But that’s not at all what was going on that night. It turns out that the whole way people have been picturing this crime is just wrong.

: Veel mensen zagen dat.

: Wacht. Wat?

: Ja, veel mensen zagen ze aankomen. Ik bedoel...

: Ben je serieus?

: Ja. Mensen waren buiten en kinderen waren buiten. En ik sprak met meerdere families die ze zagen komen en gaan.

: Kunt u zich herinneren waar u was toen u voor het eerst van de ontvoering hoorde?

: Nou, eigenlijk hoorde ik de jongens langs me heen gaan.

: Curtis sprak met ene Jim Kline. In 1989 woonde hij aan de doodlopende weg, iets dichter bij de stad. En op de avond van 22 oktober werkte hij in zijn garage aan een auto.

: Ja, ze liepen gewoon met hun... kwamen terug van de supermarkt of wat dan ook, en liepen gewoon voor mijn garage langs. Ik liep toevallig buiten toen ze langsliepen en herkende wie het was, maar dat was het.

: Gek. Dus, je zag ze waarschijnlijk rond 9 uur die avond of zo, toch?

: Ja, helpt me thuis.

: You’re probably like one of the last people to see him.

: Ja, mogelijk.

: Wow.

: Jim Klein says he wasn’t talked to by law enforcement until a week or two later, and he, actually, wasn’t the last person to see the boys that night.

: We waren buiten, en hij en ik waren de enige twee buiten. Misschien waren de andere kinderen naar binnen gegaan.

: Yeah, because that’s how the lady got in.

: En we spraken kort met hen.

: I talked to a brother and sister named Adam and Erica Sundquist who lived very close to the abduction site, about a two-minute walk down the road. They were 12 and 9 at the time. And that night, they were out playing what everyone on the block just called “night games.”

: Schop tegen het blik. Het gaat naar het kerkhof. Gewoon rare spelletjes die we bedacht hebben.

: Ja.

: Ik herinner me dat kick the can het meest waarschijnlijk was.

: Weet je nog wat we deden?

: We’re throwing corn in there, where they kick of-

: Wat?

: We had corn. We had corn from the field. We’re shelling it, and throwing it in the air.

: Adam en Erica staan in de tuin maïs te gooien en zien Jacob, Trevor en Aaron op de terugweg van de Tom Thumb. Ze zeiden dat de jongens erg langzaam gingen. Ze gooiden zelfs wat maïs naar hen als grap.

: Het was letterlijk binnen een minuut dat ze langs ons huis fietsten dat ze die heuvel opgingen. Het was binnen een minuut omdat het maar een minuut duurt om die afstand te fietsen, toch?

: Ja, een minuut of twee, wat nogal griezelig was.

: Een paar minuten nadat de jongens hun huis passeerden, herinnerden Erica en Adam zich dat ze een bordeauxrode auto, met een soort opgekrikte achterkant, voorbij zagen rijden op weg naar het zuiden, in dezelfde richting als de jongens.

: It’s going up the hill towards where they went, pass us. So, I don’t know. I mean, there is no road to turn off of. If you’re going to get down the hill, there’s two cul de sacs. And then, you had to come back through.

: Ja, er was geen uitgang die kant op. Je moest terug naar ons huis om eruit te komen, je weet wel, vanaf daar.

: Juist.

: Then, we went in the house. We’ve never seen anyone drive back through.

: Erica and Adam say they don’t remember any law enforcement officers knocking on their door that night. They don’t remember ever talking to investigators, but they assume they must have, at some point. I do know their story matches what they were saying back then because they found a 15-second interview they did with a local TV news reporter back in 1989, just a day or so after Jacob was abducted.

: Ze gingen die kant op. En dan zien we die auto heel snel voorbij rijden, en hij ging dezelfde kant op.

: I wasn’t sure how seriously investigators would take this kind of information from a couple of kids. Is this the sort of thing that you’d elevate or just shrug off because, you know, 10-year-olds. But Patrick Zirpoli, the child abduction expert, told me that not only should you take these kinds of stories seriously, you should actually seek them out because kids notice things adults don’t.

: I’ve always said you want to look for that person who, not the parents think is odd, but other children in the neighborhood may say that this person is odd. “You know, he has been at the school bus before, the school bus stop before. He has talked to us in the park.” Those are those individuals that you want to start looking for immediately because, you know, if they’re in that area, you know, you want to identify them, identify their whereabouts as soon as you can.

: Sommige buren die het dichtst bij de ontvoeringsplek woonden, vermoedden toen al dat er iets niet klopte aan het onderzoek. En sommige redenen waarom ze dat dachten zijn opvallend. En eerlijk gezegd, in sommige gevallen, een beetje vreemd. Laat me u vertellen over een familie genaamd de Klaphakes. Zij woonden aan een doodlopende weg. En hun verhaal over hoe ze de onderzoekers voor het eerst ontmoetten begint op een vreemde en duistere manier. Curtis speelde me een deel van het gesprek dat hij had met Jerry Klaphake, de vader van de familie.

: De Klaphakes waren op de dag van de ontvoering op bezoek bij familie in Twin Cities. Ze kwamen terug. Hun auto ging een half uur buiten de stad kapot. Die moest gerepareerd worden. Ze gingen naar huis. Ze gingen naar bed. De volgende dag waren er veel politieauto's en media in de buurt, en hun hond werd aangereden. Jerry Klaphake had zijn buurman bij zich, en hij beschreef het begraven van de hond in hun achtertuin.

: And my neighbor, my next-door neighbor, was with me. I had just tilled up my garden, and I thought that’s probably a good place to bury the dog. And so, I remember, at night, we’re out there, and digging this hole, putting my dog in it, and then covering it up. Yeah, I told my neighbor. I said. “You’re my witness. This is my dog down here,” because I was convinced that, you know, it’s a fresh grave. Basically, you know, dirt dug up. And they just had a ton of people doing a search in the woods behind our house. They were within probably 15 feet off my garden. And I was all surprised that they didn’t catch that. And if they miss that, you know, what else did they miss. You know, that’s what I thought at that time.

: Jerry Klaphake vertelde Curtis, dat de persoon met wie hij moet praten zijn zoon Adam is.

: Could you just introduce yourself or say your name, so I can make sure you’re being recorded okay?

: Ja. Mijn naam is Adam Klaphake.

: En hoe oud ben jij, Adam?

: Ik ben nu 41.

: Back in 1989, Adam was 14. He was friends with Jacob Wetterling. He would go over to the Wetterlings’ house for sleepovers. And people in the neighborhood would even talk about how the boys looked alike. Adam said, first of all, there were other weird things that had happened on that dead-end road, including this one thing that happened about five or six years before Jacob was kidnapped.

: Ik was waarschijnlijk 9 of 8, 9 of 10 jaar oud, ergens in die tijd.

: Adam en enkele andere kinderen speelden kickball in de tuin. Het was rond de schemering.

: And somebody kicked the ball over the hedge, and it had gone over the road, gone in the ditch. So, I jumped. I remember jumping to the hedge, running across the road to go grab the ball. I grabbed the ball. And as I’m grabbing it, somebody picked me up. I couldn’t see the face after that. You know, I had my back to him. He had me like in a bear hug, or a bear hold, or whatever. And the person had glasses. I remember that, and kind of a dark, raspy voice. And then, as he’s holding me up, he holds me pretty tight. My sister had opened the door and yelled for us that I needed to come in. And the guy says to me, ‘You’re lucky your sister called you,” and he threw me down. And I never saw him.

: Adam told Curtis he remembers telling his dad, but they didn’t call the police. A few years pass, and then another strange thing happens to Adam on that same dead-end road in 1989, just a month or two before Jacob was kidnapped.

: Een paar maanden voor de ontvoering liepen hij en zijn vriend Brandon terug van de Tom Thumb.

: Ik was toen 14. Brandon was 12. We gingen praktisch elke avond naar de Tom Thumb. Dat deden we vaak die zomer. En het was donker. Het was na 10 uur 's avonds.

: En ze werden achtervolgd door een auto...

: Wow.

: ...op diezelfde weg.

: De doodlopende weg, waar een maand of twee later een man Jacob zou grijpen en in zijn auto zou zetten.

: En dus sprongen ze in de sloot.

: Hij had gelijk... Hij was heel dichtbij, vlak achter ons. En dus raakten we de sloot. En toen was hij daar.

: Oh mijn god.

: And very freaked out, and they ran to Brandon’s house, which is like three doors down from the Klaphakes.

: The boys ran in to Brandon’s parents garage.

: Dus gingen we zo snel als we konden zijn garage in. En de auto reed zijn oprit op, en reed achteruit. En toen zette hij hem gewoon in het parkeervak, en remde af. En hij staarde naar ons.

: En ze zeggen dat ze een soort staarwedstrijd hebben met deze auto en de man in de auto voor wat Adam beschrijft als een paar minuten.

: Wat?

: En toen renden ze naar binnen.

: Hebben ze gezien wie de persoon in de auto was?

: Ja.

: Hebben ze hem herkend?

: Nee.

: En wat dachten ze dat deze persoon aan het doen was?

: Griezelig zijn.

: Oké, maar om terug te gaan...

: Maar hoe dan ook...

: ...aan. Dus, wat voor soort auto was het?

: Het was een blauwe auto.

: Een blauwe auto.

: Ja.

: Niet zomaar een blauwe auto.

: My friend’s mother had a Pontiac 6000. And we compared it to that. I think, they said it was a blue car that looks similar to a Pontiac 6000.

: A blue Pontiac 6000. Here’s what stopped me short about that, the car that Danny Heinrich was driving the night he kidnapped Jacob was a blue Ford EXP, but that car, that blue Ford looks a whole lot like a Pontiac 6000. Both are kind of boxy, low to the ground, would be easy to mistake one car for the other.

: Adam and his dad say no one came and knocked on their door the night Jacob was kidnapped. No one came by that night to ask if they’d seen anything. No one asked Adam that night if he’d ever seen anyone creepy in the neighborhood.

: I remember waking up the next morning because we didn’t even know what had happened that night. And the dogs were barking in my bedroom window, and, you know, the police going through our yard and everything like that. That’s how I woke up.

: Adam zei dat er nog steeds niemand van de politie naar hem toe kwam om te vragen of hij iets gezien had. Dus vroeg hij zijn vader om hen een paar dagen later naar het commandocentrum te rijden. En Adam zei dat zowel hij als zijn vriend, Brandon, de auto beschreven aan de onderzoekers. Adam zei dat hij hetzelfde verhaal een paar dagen later aan de FBI vertelde.

: De autoriteiten hebben nooit meer met me gesproken nadat de FBI bij ons thuis was geweest, en ik ben het een beetje vergeten.

: He’s never asked to look at any pictures or?

: You know, I kind of thought that maybe they would press me a little more and maybe, you know, ask me some more questions about it. Who knows. Maybe even try to hypnotize me or something like that. But, you know, I said I’d do anything to help, and they don’t want to have anything to do with it.

: Years past, but Adam couldn’t get the story out of his mind. Maybe the guy in the car was the same guy who’d kidnapped Jacob. It, certainly, seems similar, same road, a couple of kids, Adam even looked like Jacob.

: Okay. So, in 2004, Adam Klaphake takes the day off of work to go talk to the sheriff again. He wants to tell the story again. You know, he doesn’t remember it nearly as well. You know, it’s what?

: 15 jaar later.

: 15 years later. And he offers to take them on a drive through the neighborhood. “I’ll show you where this happened, and where we were chased from, and the route we would always take to go to the Tom Thumb.” And he said that the police did not seem or the sheriff detective, who is the same detective who had interviewed him 15 years earlier, he didn’t seem interested.

: I remember leaving out of there just so angry because they weren’t listening to anything that I had to say.

: Adam said, for a long time, he figured the reason that investigators didn’t seem interested was because maybe his details back then weren’t great. Maybe his account was totally different from his friend, Brandon’s. Maybe the whole thing was so vague that it was just useless. But about a year ago, Adam got curious, and asked a sheriff’s deputy if he could look at his old statement, that statement he gave to law enforcement as a kid.

: When I got the transcripts, my jaw dropped because I don’t remember being able to identify the guy. That blew me away. Again, I thought my friend and I had disagreed upon the color of car, and that’s why it was never brought up again. But that wasn’t the case. We did agree on the color of the car, and we did agree on the description of the man, shorter hair, kind of a stocky build. There were probably a few other details that I don’t remember, but we both said that we could identify him in a lineup.

: And, you know, of course, like, then, you wonder, you know, “Okay, lineups aren’t great,” but you do wonder if they had put a bunch of photos in front of these two kids in separate rooms in October of 1989, what they would have said.

: Yeah, we’ll never know.

: In the whole time, you know, you got two guys, a quarter of a mile from the abduction site that could possibly have identified him and no one ever asked. You know, like it totally slipped through the cracks. And now, it’s too late. Now, it’s too late, you know.

: And here’s the thing, Adam wasn’t the first person to tell law enforcement about a creepy man in a blue car. Nine months before Jacob was kidnapped, there was another kid in the same county who was walking on a road one night when a man pulled up in a blue car and grabbed him.

: Volgende keer in In the Dark.

New evidence tonight leaves the FBI to believe that Jacob Wetterling’s kidnapper may have struck before.

Hoeveel van dit soort psychopathische pedofielen kunnen er bestaan in een straal van 15 tot 20 mijl? Ik bedoel, waren het er meer dan één? Was er iets groters aan de hand?

If they ever come close to finding me, I’ll find you and kill you. Yeah.

There was a fear of God that was put into all of us, and that worry, and that fear, and that stress, or that … It just kind of festered and grew like a sliver. If you get a sliver in your finger, if you don’t remove the sliver, it festers, and it grows, and then just infects the wound.

Nobody’s ever asked me a single question about this or any of you guys. I’ve never been interviewed by police. I’ve never been talked to by any law enforcement ever, not one person.

: In the Dark is geproduceerd door Samara Freemark. De geassocieerde producent is Natalie Jablonski. Deze aflevering is gemaakt met aanzienlijke hulp van verslaggever Curtis Gilbert. In the Dark is geredigeerd door Catherine Winter met hulp van Hans Buetow. De hoofdredacteur van APM Reports is Chris Worthington. Webredacteuren zijn Dave Peters en Andy Kruse. De videograaf is Jeff Thompson. Aanvullende verslaggeving door Jennifer Vogel, Will Craft, Emily Haavik en Tom Scheck. Onze themamuziek is gecomponeerd door Gary Meister.

: Go to InTheDarkPodcast.org to read more about Danny Heinrich, and to watch a video of Patty Wetterling talking about the search for Jacob, and to listen to audio from Curtis’s interviews with the neighbors. And keep checking in, we’ll be posting more information each week.

Automatisch audio naar tekst omzetten met Sonix