Best Transcription Tools For Press Conferences in 2026

The best transcription tools for press conferences in 2026 are Sonix, Trint, Otter.ai, Rev, Good Tape, and Google Pinpoint. For most newsrooms and communications teams, Sonix is the strongest overall choice: it combines 自动转录 marketing up to 99% accuracy, 53+ languages for international events, and SOC 2 类型 II and HIPAA compliance requirements for enterprise newsrooms. Trint is well-suited for real-time transcription at live events. Rev is a strong option when human-verified accuracy is a priority.

Press conferences are uniquely difficult to transcribe: a dozen reporters crowd around a podium, questions fly from every corner of the room, and the audio feed competes with shuffling feet, microphone feedback, and the ambient noise of a hotel ballroom. The moment it ends, the clock is running. You have quotes to verify, soundbites to pull, and a story to file.

Manual transcription does not survive that environment. Neither does software built for quiet one-on-one interviews.

The best transcription tools for press conferences share three traits: they accurately separate multiple speakers without prompting, they hold up against real-world audio conditions, and they return clean, searchable text fast enough to be useful on deadline. This guide covers six tools that journalism teams, communications professionals, and media organizations rely on most: Sonix, Trint, Otter.ai, Rev, Good Tape, and Google Pinpoint, with honest detail on what each one delivers.

主要收获

• Sonix combines automated transcription marketing up to 99% accuracy, 53 多种语言，以及 SOC 2 类型 II and HIPAA compliance, making it the strongest overall choice for press conference transcription at scale.
• Speaker diarization quality varies significantly between tools. Sonix, Trint, and Rev handle multi-speaker audio differently; the right choice depends on speaker count and whether real-time output is required.
• Human transcription for a two-hour press conference at $1.99/minute costs approximately $239. Sonix automated at $5/audio hour costs $10 for the same file.
• Multilingual press conferences require broad language support. Sonix covers 53 多种语言 for transcription and 54 多种语言 for translation.
• Enterprise security requirements, including SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliance, and data residency, matter for legal and government press conferences. Sonix meets all three.
• Free options exist. Google Pinpoint provides no-cost transcription for verified journalists with 100GB storage.

Why Press Conferences Are Hard to Transcribe

Press conferences combine 5 to 20+ simultaneous speakers, unmoderated cross-talk, and crowd noise, dropping automated accuracy significantly in a live event. Only tools with dedicated speaker diarization models built for multi-speaker recordings handle these conditions reliably.

Most transcription tools are benchmarked against podcasts or one-on-one interviews: a single speaker, a quiet room, a consistent microphone distance. Press conferences break every one of those assumptions.

• Multi-speaker chaos. A typical press conference involves an opening statement followed by unmoderated questions from a room full of reporters. The speaker attribution problem, which is who asked that question and who answered it, is genuinely hard for automated systems. Overlapping speech and rapid back-and-forth exchanges increase error rates in tools that lack dedicated speaker diarization models.
• Environmental noise. Crowd audio, HVAC systems, microphone feedback, and room reverb all compete with the primary speaker. Background noise can significantly degrade transcription accuracy in live environments.
• Deadline pressure. A journalist covering a morning press conference for a 2 p.m. filing deadline cannot wait two hours for a transcript. Speed matters as much as accuracy, which is why turnaround time belongs in any serious comparison.
• Multilingual events. International press conferences, government briefings, and corporate events frequently involve speakers whose first language is not English. A tool with narrow language support creates a gap in the record.

The tools below were evaluated specifically on how they handle these conditions, not just how they perform in optimal audio.

Why Journalists Switch Tools for Press Conferences

Journalists switch press conference transcription tools when accuracy failures damage published work, deadline delays cost coverage, or pricing models stop scaling. These three triggers drive most tool changes in newsrooms.

The most common trigger for switching is a high-profile accuracy failure at a live event. A misattributed quote in print carries real consequences: corrections, credibility damage, and in some contexts, legal exposure.

The second trigger is workflow friction. Some tools return transcripts in 15 minutes; others take 45. That difference is invisible in a planning session and completely visible at deadline. The ability to scan a searchable transcript for a specific quote in seconds rather than rewinding audio is the actual productivity gain that keeps journalists on these platforms.

The third trigger is scale. A solo reporter covering one briefing per week has different requirements than a communications team managing a major product launch with five hours of press conference audio to process in a single day. Per-file pricing models become expensive fast at scale; per-hour billing offers more predictable cost control.

Best Transcription Tools for Press Conferences: 2026

1. ǞǞǞ — Best Overall (markets up to 99% accuracy, 53+ languages, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, $10/hr Standard)
2. 特林特 — Real-Time Live Event Transcription (Trint Live for breaking news workflows)
3. Otter.ai — Solo Reporters on a Budget ($16.99/month, English/French/Spanish)
4. 修订 — Human-Verified Accuracy ($1.99/min human review, HIPAA BAA)
5. Good Tape — Privacy-First Investigative Journalism (EU servers, GDPR, default deletion)
6. Google Pinpoint — Free Option for Newsrooms (100GB storage, 100+ languages, verified journalists)

1. Sonix — Best Transcription Tool for Press Conferences

Sonix is the strongest transcription tool for press conferences. The combination of automated transcription marketing up to 99% accuracy (real-world results vary with audio quality and speaker overlap), 53+ language support, SOC 2 Type II certification, HIPAA compliance, and per-hour pricing that scales without a fixed monthly cap makes it the most complete offering for newsrooms and communications teams processing press conference volume.

Sonix is used by more than 6.2 million users who have transcribed over 14.2 million hours of content across media, healthcare, legal, and enterprise research (Sonix-reported). Organizations including Google, Microsoft, Stanford, ESPN, and Adobe rely on Sonix for audio and video transcription workflows that demand accuracy at scale.

For press conference transcription, Sonix’s speaker diarization handles multi-speaker recordings with per-speaker labeling and word-level timestamps. Upload a 90-minute press conference file and the transcript returns with each speaker labeled and each utterance timestamped. The in-browser editor makes it fast to search for specific quotes, jump to audio timestamps, and 出口 in DOCX, SRT, TXT, or PDF formats.

Organizations with multilingual event coverage benefit from Sonix’s 53+ language support. Transcripts can be translated into 54+ languages directly from the platform without leaving the workflow.

主要功能

• 人工智能 speaker diarization with per-speaker labeling and timestamped segments
• In-browser transcript editor with audio playback sync
• 人工智能分析工具, including summaries and highlights for fast quote extraction (available as an add-on, not included in Standard)
• 53+ language support for multilingual press conferences and international briefings
• Translation into 54+ languages directly from the transcript
• SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliance, and AES-256 encryption for enterprise security requirements
• Real-time transcription available on Enterprise plans
• 应用程序接口访问 for newsroom CMS integrations and automated workflows
• 整合 with Adobe Premiere, Avid, Zapier, Google Drive, Dropbox, and more
• 30-minute free trial, no credit card required

优势

• Automated transcription marketing up to 99% accuracy, with real-world results varying by audio conditions
• 53 多种语言 for transcription and 54 多种语言 for translation, covering international press conferences
• SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliance, and AES-256 encryption covering the broadest enterprise security baseline in this comparison
• Per-hour pricing ($5/hr on Premium) makes large-scale processing economically predictable
• In-browser editor with audio sync enables fast quote extraction and timestamp navigation in one interface
• Proven at enterprise scale: 6.2M+ users, 14.2M+ hours transcribed (Sonix-reported); clients include Google, Microsoft, Stanford, ESPN, and Adobe

Workflow Notes

• Sonix is built around uploaded-audio transcription, browser editing, and API-connected workflows; real-time transcription is available on Enterprise plans
• AI Analysis tools (summaries, topic detection) are available as an add-on and are not included in the Standard plan
• Teams publishing editorial content typically run a quick QA pass on speaker names, quotes, and attributed statements before final use

最适合

Sonix is the strongest choice for media organizations and newsrooms and communications teams processing significant press conference volume: multiple files per week, multilingual events, or audio with challenging acoustic conditions. The per-hour pricing model makes large-scale processing economically predictable in a way that per-seat subscription models do not. It is also the right tool for any organization with enterprise compliance requirements across healthcare, legal, and government press conferences.

Sonix 定价

• 标准： $10/audio hour – pay-as-you-go, no subscription required
• Premium： $22/user/month (monthly) or $16.50/user/month (annual), plus $5/audio hour for transcription and translation
• 企业： Custom pricing with SSO, real-time transcription, dedicated support
• 免费试用： 30 minutes, no credit card required

免费试用 Sonix for 30 minutes, no credit card required.

2. Trint

Trint was built specifically for journalists, newsrooms, and broadcast media teams. It is used by editorial operations at major news organizations for live transcription, collaborative editing, and content workflow tools. The standout feature is Trint Live, available on Advanced and Enterprise plans, which provides real-time transcription as the event unfolds. For a breaking news team that needs quotes immediately rather than waiting for a post-event upload to process, that real-time capability is a meaningful differentiator.

The collaborative editing environment is purpose-built for multi-person newsrooms. Multiple editors can work on the same transcript simultaneously, add comments, and tag sections, a workflow that maps directly to how editorial teams operate under deadline pressure. Story Builder lets reporters highlight quotes, tag speakers, and assemble story scripts directly inside the platform.

Trint supports 40+ languages for recorded transcription, with Trint Live auto-detecting 30+ languages for live events. API and CMS integrations cover broadcast publishing pipelines and content management systems.

主要功能

• Trint Live for real-time transcription at live events and press conferences (Advanced and Enterprise plans)
• Story Builder for assembling story scripts from highlighted transcript passages
• Multi-editor collaborative workspaces with commenting and tagging
• Closed caption editor with SRT and WebVTT export
• 40+ language support for recorded transcription; 30+ languages for Trint Live
• API and CMS integrations for broadcast workflows
• 7-day free trial available

优势

• Trint Live provides real-time transcription at live events for breaking news workflows
• Story Builder enables reporters to build story scripts directly from highlighted transcript passages without leaving the platform
• Multi-editor collaborative workspaces with commenting support, newsroom deadline workflows
• API and CMS integrations cover broadcast publishing pipelines

Workflow Notes

• Trint is best evaluated as a newsroom-style editorial collaboration platform with real-time transcription as a key differentiator
• Story Builder and collaborative editing are most useful when multiple reporters share transcripts and build stories from the same source material under a deadline
• Confirm current pricing directly with Trint, as plan details and rates are subject to change

Who It Works Well For

Trint works well when newsroom-style editorial collaboration is the actual workflow requirement. If you have multiple reporters sharing transcripts, building stories from the same source material, and working on a deadline in a shared system, Trint’s Story Builder and collaborative editing environment are purpose-built for that use case.

Trint 定价

Trint pricing is plan-based with Starter, Advanced, and Enterprise tiers. Confirm current pricing directly with Trint, as rates and plan structures vary. A 7-day free trial is available. Annual billing is required on most plans.

For teams evaluating Trint against other platforms, the best Trint alternatives are ranked for accuracy and multilingual coverage on the Sonix blog.

3.Otter.ai

Otter.ai is a real-time meeting transcription and collaboration platform that handles both in-person events via mobile app and virtual briefings via native conferencing integration. Its real-time transcription capability and mobile app make it useful for field work: a reporter can run Otter on their phone at a live event and pull a rough transcript immediately.

Otter supports transcription in English, French, and Spanish per its plans page. The platform adds AI-generated meeting summaries linked to transcript timestamps and includes filler-word removal to make quotes cleaner before editing.

Otter integrates natively with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, which covers the virtual press conference format that became standard in many industries. For reporters covering earnings calls, government briefings hosted online, or virtual product launches, the native conferencing integration reduces setup steps.

主要功能

• Real-time automated transcription with live speaker labels
• AI summaries linked to transcript timestamps
• Filler-word removal for cleaner published quotes
• Mobile app for field recording and live events
• Native Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams integration
• Searchable transcript archive with full-text search
• Transcription in English, French, and Spanish

优势

• Real-time transcription via mobile app covers both in-person field recording and live-event scenarios
• Native integration with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams handles virtual press conferences without additional setup
• AI summaries linked to timestamps speed up quote review after long events
• Filler-word removal reduces editorial cleanup time on unscripted Q&A audio
• Accessible at $16.99/user/month for individual reporters

Workflow Notes

• Otter is best aligned to English, French, and Spanish press conference workflows and live meeting-assistant-style capture
• Its mobile app is particularly useful for field reporters covering in-person events without a dedicated recording setup
• Buyers should validate whether live-capture workflows or post-recording archive quality matter more to their team

Who It Works Well For

Otter.ai works well for solo journalists who cover press conferences primarily in English, French, or Spanish and want a single tool that handles both in-person events via mobile and virtual briefings via conferencing integration.

Otter.ai 定价

• 基础： Free (limited minutes per month)
• Pro： $16.99/user/month (monthly billing)
• 业务： $30/user/month (monthly billing)
• 企业： 定制

Teams considering Otter.ai alongside other platforms can browse the top Otter.ai alternatives ranked by accuracy, language coverage, and enterprise fit.

4.修订

Rev offers two distinct transcription tracks: automated AI transcription and human-verified transcription. The distinction matters for press conference use cases where quote accuracy is non-negotiable.

The human transcription service, priced at $1.99 per minute, delivers 99%+ accuracy with professional transcriptionists reviewing the output. For a legal, government, or corporate press conference where a misquoted statement creates liability, the human review layer provides a higher level of assurance. A two-hour press conference at $1.99/minute costs approximately $239 for the human tier.

Rev’s AI transcription is competitive with other automated tools and returns results faster than the human service. Speaker diarization is available across both tracks. The platform supports captions, subtitles, and localization workflows for organizations with multilingual distribution needs. HIPAA compliance with BAA is available.

主要功能

• Human-reviewed transcription delivering 99%+ accuracy
• AI automated transcription with speaker diarization
• Verbatim or clean-read transcript options
• Caption and subtitle generation
• API access for workflow integration
• Timestamped transcripts with speaker labels
• HIPAA-compliant BAA available

优势

• Human transcription tier for documents where a single accurate quote matters more than turnaround speed
• Both AI and human tracks are available from a single platform with consistent output format
• Verbatim and clean-read options accommodate editorial and legal documentation requirements
• Caption and subtitle generation serves organizations with accessibility and multilingual distribution needs

Workflow Notes

• Rev is best evaluated as a flexible transcript-and-verification workflow for teams with mixed accuracy stakes
• The per-minute pricing model scales predictably for volume users but adds up quickly compared to per-hour platforms at high volume
• Rev’s subscription and per-minute options give teams room to match usage patterns across varying event volumes

Who It Works Well For

Rev works well for legal proceedings, medical press briefings, and high-stakes corporate announcements where the cost of an error exceeds the cost of human review. For volume users, the per-minute pricing model scales predictably.

修订定价

• 人工智能转录： $0.25/audio minute
• 人类转录： $1.99/audio minute
• 人工智能字幕： $0.25/audio minute | 人类字幕： $1.99/audio minute
• Essentials: Subscriptions start at $29.99/user/month

For a broader shortlist, the best Rev alternatives cover top options ranked by accuracy, turnaround, and API capability.

5. Good Tape

Good Tape was developed in collaboration with the investigative team at Zetland, a Danish digital journalism outlet, specifically to address the real-world needs of field reporters: handling background noise, identifying multiple speakers in uncontrolled environments, and protecting the confidentiality of sources and recordings.

The privacy model is the clearest differentiator. Good Tape operates on EU-based servers, holds formal GDPR compliance, deletes recordings by default after processing, and explicitly commits to never training its AI on customer files. For investigative journalists, foreign correspondents, or any reporter handling sensitive sources, this data handling posture is meaningfully different from U.S.-based tools.

Speaker diarization and multi-language support (100+ languages) are core features. The tool was designed with field conditions in mind, including noisy recordings, variable microphone quality, and the kind of audio that a crowded press conference often produces.

主要功能

• GDPR-compliant architecture with EU-based data residency
• Recordings are deleted by default after transcription
• Formal commitment to never train AI on customer files
• Speaker diarization for multi-person recordings
• 100+ language support for international press coverage
• Designed specifically for journalism field work

优势

• EU-based data residency with GDPR compliance, the strongest privacy posture in this comparison
• Recordings deleted by default after transcription with no data retention exposure
• Formal commitment to not training AI models on customer files
• Speaker diarization and 100+ language support cover international field reporting conditions

Workflow Notes

• Good Tape is best evaluated as a privacy-first tool for journalists covering sensitive events, where data handling practices are as important as transcription accuracy
• The default deletion policy and no-training commitment are the core differentiators for investigative use cases
• Confirm current plan details and pricing directly with Good Tape

Who It Works Well For

Good Tape works well for journalists covering sensitive events, including investigative press conferences, government briefings, and whistleblower-adjacent stories, where the data handling practices of the transcription platform are as important as the accuracy of the output.

Good Tape Pricing

• 启动器 Free (limited minutes)
• Pro： €16/month (billed annually)
• Team plans available; confirm current pricing directly with Good Tape

6. Google Pinpoint

Google Pinpoint is a journalist-specific tool built and maintained by Google News Lab. It is free with no hidden paid tiers for core transcription functionality and provides 100GB of storage, enough for most individual and small-team workflows.

The platform is designed for the document and audio research workflow: upload a collection of press conference recordings, transcripts, PDFs, and documents, and Pinpoint makes the entire collection full-text searchable. For investigative journalists building a document archive, the ability to search across audio and text in a single interface is a genuine research productivity tool.

Pinpoint transcribes in over 100 languages. Speaker diarization is available for multi-person recordings. Access requires journalist verification.

主要功能

• Completely free with no core feature paywalls for verified journalists
• 100GB storage for audio, video, documents, and images
• Full-text search across all uploaded media and documents
• Speaker labels and timestamped transcripts
• Document analysis alongside audio transcription
• Transcription in over 100 languages

优势

• Free for verified journalists with 100GB storage, no trial period or hidden tiers
• Full-text search across mixed media collections (audio, documents, PDFs) in a single interface
• Built by Google News Lab specifically for journalism document research workflows
• Combines transcription with document analysis for investigative research use cases
• Broad language support (100+) for international press conference coverage

Workflow Notes

• Pinpoint requires journalist verification to access; confirm eligibility before building it into a workflow
• The free tier covers core transcription and search; advanced editing features are available in paid tools
• Most useful as a searchable archive platform rather than a primary transcript editing environment

Who It Works Well For

Google Pinpoint works well for budget-constrained newsrooms and individual journalists who want a free, searchable archive for their press conference recordings and research documents.

Google Pinpoint Pricing

• Free for verified journalists (requires journalist verification)

Transcription Tools for Press Conferences: Feature Comparison

• Sonix： Markets up to 99% accuracy; 53+ languages; real-time on Enterprise; AI speaker diarization; SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, AES-256; API access; $10/hr Standard, $5/hr Premium (plus seat subscription); 30-minute free trial
• 特林特 Real-time via Trint Live (Advanced+); 40+ languages recorded, 30+ live; Story Builder; multi-editor collaboration; API and CMS integrations; confirm pricing with Trint
• Otter.ai： Real-time AI transcription; English, French, and Spanish; AI summaries; mobile app; Zoom/Teams/Meet integration; $16.99/user/month Pro
• Rev: Human transcription at 99%+ accuracy; AI and human tracks; 37+ languages; HIPAA BAA; $0.25/min AI or $1.99/min human; Essentials from $29.99/user/month
• Good Tape: GDPR, EU servers, default deletion, no AI training on customer files; 100+ languages; speaker diarization; €16/month Pro (billed annually)
• Google Pinpoint: Free for verified journalists; 100GB storage; 100+ languages; full-text search across audio and documents; speaker labels

Availability may vary by plan. Confirm current feature access and pricing directly with each vendor.

How to Choose Your Press Conference Transcription Tool

Choosing the right press conference transcription tool comes down to four factors: speaker count, language requirements, deadline speed (real-time vs. post-event), and compliance needs. For most newsrooms, Sonix is the strongest default choice.

Use this framework to narrow the field quickly:

• Highest automated accuracy across complex multi-speaker audio: ǞǞǞ
• Real-time transcription at live events and breaking news workflows: Trint (Advanced or Enterprise)
• Solo journalist covering English, French, or Spanish events on a budget: Otter.ai
• Human-verified quotes for legal, medical, or high-stakes events: Rev (human transcription tier)
• Investigative journalism with strict source confidentiality requirements: Good Tape
• Free archive with full-text search across audio and documents: Google Pinpoint
• Multilingual international press conferences: Sonix (53+ languages)
• HIPAA compliance for healthcare press briefings: ǞǞǞ
• Newsroom team with collaborative editorial workflow: 特林特

Volume and cost. For high-volume processing, multiple press conferences per week, or large event archives, Sonix’s per-hour pricing ($5/hr Premium) is the most cost-predictable model. Trint’s per-seat subscription works well for teams with consistent monthly volume. Rev’s per-minute pricing adds up quickly at scale.

Audio quality. If your typical press conference audio is recorded in controlled conditions with quality microphones, most tools in this list perform reliably. If your recordings come from crowded rooms, outdoor events, or variable microphone setups, tools with stronger noise-robust acoustic models hold up better.

Compliance requirements. For healthcare, legal, and government press conferences, the security baseline matters. Sonix’s combination of SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliance, and AES-256 encryption covers the broadest range of enterprise security requirements in this category.

Final Verdict: Best Transcription Tools for Press Conferences in 2026

There is no single best tool for every press conference team. The right choice depends on workflow, language requirements, deadline constraints, and compliance needs.

• For the highest automated accuracy across multi-speaker and multilingual events, ǞǞǞ is the strongest choice: 53+ languages, enterprise compliance, and per-hour pricing that scales without surprises.
• 对于 real-time transcription at live events and breaking news workflows, 特林特 (Advanced plan) is well-suited: Story Builder and Trint Live are purpose-built for newsroom deadline work.
• 对于 solo reporters covering English, French, or Spanish events on a limited budget, Otter.ai covers both in-person and virtual briefings at an accessible price.
• 对于 high-stakes quotes where accuracy is non-negotiable, Rev’s human transcription tier delivers 99%+ accuracy with professional review.
• 对于 investigative journalists covering sensitive events, Good Tape provides EU data residency, default deletion, and a formal commitment against AI training on customer files.
• 对于 budget-conscious newsrooms and verified journalists, Google Pinpoint delivers free transcription with 100GB of searchable storage.

If your primary need is automated accuracy across multilingual press conferences at scale, see Sonix pricing or start with the free trial.

免费试用 Sonix for 30 minutes, no credit card required.

Frequently Asked Questions About Transcription Tools for Press Conferences

What is the best transcription tool for press conferences?

Sonix is the strongest overall option for press conference transcription, combining automated transcription marketing up to 99% accuracy, 53+ language coverage, SOC 2 Type II certification, HIPAA compliance, and per-hour pricing that scales predictably for multi-file workflows. For breaking news teams that need real-time output as the event unfolds, Trint’s Live feature on Advanced and Enterprise plans provides running transcripts during the event. For high-stakes quotes where accuracy is non-negotiable, Rev’s human transcription tier at $1.99/min delivers the highest verified accuracy level.

How much does it cost to transcribe a two-hour press conference?

A two-hour press conference costs $10 with Sonix at $5/audio hour (Premium plan). Rev’s AI service at $0.25/minute runs approximately $30 for the same file. Rev’s human transcription at $1.99/minute costs approximately $239. Otter.ai’s monthly subscription at $16.99/month covers use within plan limits, making it cost-effective for regular coverage. Google Pinpoint is free for verified journalists.

Can AI transcription tools accurately handle multiple speakers at a press conference?

Yes, the leading tools in this category use speaker diarization models designed for multi-speaker environments. Sonix, Trint, and Rev all label individual speakers in the transcript with timestamps. Performance varies based on audio quality: tools perform best when speakers take clear turns and microphone placement captures voices distinctly. For recordings with significant overlap or more than 10 to 12 simultaneous speakers, some manual review of speaker labels is typical.

Which transcription tool is best for multilingual press conferences?

Sonix 支持 53 多种语言 用于自动转录和 translation into 54+ languages, covering the widest range for international press conference coverage. Good Tape and Google Pinpoint both support 100+ languages. Trint supports 40+ languages for recorded transcription and 30+ for Trint Live. For events where speakers present in multiple languages within a single session, Sonix’s translation workflow converts transcripts directly from the platform.

Is press conference transcription software GDPR compliant?

Most leading press conference transcription tools offer GDPR compliance, but data residency, deletion policies, and processing agreements differ significantly. Good Tape has the strongest GDPR posture: EU-based servers, default deletion of recordings after transcription, and a formal commitment to not training AI models on customer files. Sonix, Trint, and Otter.ai all have GDPR compliance documentation available, though data residency policies differ. For investigative journalists handling sensitive sources, reviewing each tool’s data processing agreement before uploading sensitive material is advisable.